• Overall total investment costs less with automated testing (script generation time + maintenance time + tools cost)
• 53% savings from reuse of scripts – savings from automated testing vs. manual testing
• Testers spend 60% less time on script generation as a result of script reuse
• Testers have more time available to analyze results and collaborate with development on investigating and reproducing bugs, which results in fixing them sooner, and producing higher quality applications.
• Script reuse throughout the various areas of testing – functional testing to performance and stress testing – provides significant savings in time and money.